Those who are in "same sex" relationships are not looking to be married, they want to be in a same sex union. The only secular argument against gay marriage that I've even heard is that gay people would not provide children with a stable home. I have even been told I am going to hell. House of Representatives told the Justices in a filing in one of the new cases: If homosexual relationships are, in this manner, legally recognized as marriages, no realities will change.
Defending Your Wife - Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage
The original purpose of marriage has been to create a commitment to a relationship so that a child would have a solid foundation for which to be raised. The Hawaiian hint, of course, ran counter to a traditional understanding about marriage. Rather, it is an appeal for judges and lawmakers to ignore those distinctions in order not to deny citizens the right to call things what they want to call them. Provided with benefits such as tax deductions and tax breaks, married heterosexual couples will be more likely to raise their child together, some say. The influence of religion on sexual politics in Australia is central to the current marriage debate. I wish kids in my high school had been asked to role-play gay relationships in Year 7.
Are there any good secular arguments against gay marriage? | ilparco.info
Marriage equality will harm the children of same-sex couples in particular. If you want to deny someone because of their sexual orientation a basic human right that you take for granted, you are proving that you actually do not believe that gay and straight people are equal. Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays makes the same point. Firstly, studies have shown that with a father present, children would grow up with a lower chance of anti-social tendencies and girls in particular would be able to resist the sexual advances of their boyfriends with more confidence and a stronger stand. Hillary Clinton shifts on same-sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage is an injustice against the child. Like any analogy, the analogy of ours that Yoshino criticizes was meant to illustrate a limited point: It necessarily follows that Congress may use the same traditional definition of marriage for federal purposes without violating equal protection. Those who want homosexual relationships to be redefined as marriages say that many aspects of their relationships are like marriage—having sexual play, living together, loving one another, etc. Same-sex marriage, some would and did argue, was nothing less than a suicide pact for humanity. To recognize in law the distinct character of a marriage relationship, which entails sexual intercourse, involves no discrimination of a civil rights kind against those whose bonds do not include sexual intercourse.